Archive for August, 2010

This is the end.

Monday, August 30th, 2010

This installation evidences the journey from a fortune cookie message to life-changing surgery, and everything in between: the artist playing detective, his documenting the truth or otherwise in seven palm-reading predictions and his contacting long-lost relatives from across the world

My work is concerned with multiple approaches to narrative: autobiographical, fusing fact with fiction, constructing identities, and old-fashioned story-telling. It embodies my ultimate ambition to re-engage with creativity within my own practice after half a decade teaching in secondary education, through the ATMA experience.

An overriding focus has been to bring an end to the syzygy – “a yoking together of opposites in which the two elements remain distinct” (Middleton 1999: xiv) – of the two different roles I perform daily as artist and teacher, and to resolve the conflict I have experienced within these competing identities. In my writing I have often likened these tensions to the dilemmas faced by a super hero and his everyday alter ego, especially when trying to keep the ‘other’ identity secret, perhaps because “after all, western literary conventions stipulate that plots should have heroes” (Skultans, 1998: xii).

Documentation had a significant emphasis in my first year of the ATMA programme as I explored multiple avenues of enquiry triggered by the catalyst of a fortune cookie bought in a Chinese restaurant. My explorations embraced myth and rumour, street art and interventions, online ‘confessionals’ mixing fact with fiction, and undercover visits to fortune tellers, noting similarities across the seven readings I obtained, just like the work of Francis Alys.

Platt (2010: 50) believes that “Alys is a kind of story teller”, whilst Observer critic Cumming (2010: 37) also captured a spirit in Alys’s work that has inspired elements within my final show, with the title of her review of his Tate Modern retrospective A Story of Deception which stated that “it’s all perfectly pointless, but completely captivating” and “…both heroic and absurd. His art is so often poised between the two.”

I believe that my own work (once described as playful yet sincere) sits in a similar position, and shares some common themes with the ‘actions’ Alys has performed. Therefore, when it came to discussing and presenting my ideas, justifying those ‘actions’ needed careful consideration.

One of the major outcomes of this course for me was the introduction to Bourriaud’s seminal writings on ‘relational aesthetics’ (1998) and more recently, the ‘alter modern’, which were very influential when I began outlining the theoretical perspectives underpinning my work, particularly at the start of year 2 when, having resolved the first stage of my enquiries, I took some time before embarking on the next stage of the journey.

This period of reflection and research introduced me to the history of conceptual art, within which “there is an explicit emphasis on the ‘thought’ component of art and its perception” (Marzona, 2006: 7) and this helped me realise that my own recently exhibited conceptual art (which, after all, “can be almost anything” (Wilson & Lack, 2008: 52)) fitted the definition relational aesthetics (2008: 183) being as it was, one of “a set of artistic practices which take as their theoretical and practical point of departure the whole of human relations and their social context, rather than an independent and private space” and seeing “art as information exchanged between the artist and the viewers [giving] audiences access to power and the means to change the world”.

Similarly, we had Barthes’ seminal 1967 essay The Death of the Author, which itself began to influence the way I wrote my blog entries, my involving people around me in my work, and ultimately, the title of this final submission, after my introduction to it. Furthermore, as this new knowledge then informed my next projects, continuing the theme of the narrative, it helped to develop through my work a personal approach I call ‘relationship aesthetics’ which speaks of the complex and plural inter-relationships with loved ones, strangers, lookalikes and name-a-likes that feature prominently in my work.  One of the ways I did this was to ask people to suggest doubles for me, another, the unusual residency I undertook on a social networking site, fabricating familial links while surveying participants for potential coincidences / shared experiences.

The only real answers offered by this period was the realisation that I had unwittingly created an alter ego and thus, identity and personality became the focus of my final investigations, including how we see and are seen. I chose to enhance my own sight also – this seemed a natural progression because vision has played a part in every stage of my journey, whether it is seeing the future, reflecting back, noticing similarities, cases of mistaken identity – the double take – or, now, eye surgery, a form of Body Art, the ultimate artistic practice.

I do not wish to liken my work to that of Orlan or Gina Pane, but in my efforts to fuse the two different sides of my personality (or appearance, namely always wearing either glasses or contact lenses) I discovered links with others, such as Mark Wallinger’s 2000 Credo show at Tate Liverpool, concerned as it was with notions of vision, plus the likes of Magritte, Escher, Calle… indeed, many artists from history have been concerned with eyes and looking. Damien Hirst (2001: 86) spoke of being terrified at not being able to see out of ‘these two f***ing little holes’ and believed that “art’s about looking. People don’t look. Artists make people look: look at what you know; question what you know…”

This resonates with the themes underpinning my work because, having spent two years looking closely at the daily events of my life and their meaning, now I can see better than ever, not just the ‘other’ but also myself, and have shared the story of this dichotomy with everybody, proving that “the process of self-identity is a leap into a narrative that employs seeing as a way of knowing” (Phelan, 1993: 5) and that “the physiological understanding of vision, like both the psychoanalytic conception of the
gaze and the technologies of aesthetics, is also a theory of loss and distortion” (Ibid.: 14) which is why, having identified his ‘twin’, the artist will not exist after this exhibition.

Therefore, the politics of the location for my final installation were very important. Wanting closure to the story, but to keep some of the mysticism and uncertainty, I felt much more confident curating the space this time around, compared to when I was ‘halfway to paradise’ in 2009.

Just as galleries and museums are increasingly aware of their audience, so have I become, this year not just of the public but the internal and external assessors, and so planned an interactive display accordingly. It was heavily influenced by a room in A Story of Deception, and Sophie Calle’s 2009 Whitechapel retrospective, which I had used as a case study for an earlier module.

Meanwhile, the idea of publishing a book which explains the objects and images that feature within the space was a natural progression from the narrative developed over the past two years, cemented by a visit to Lindsay Seers’ submission to the current Persistence of Vision exhibition at FACT, It Has To Be This Way (2009), which is accompanied by a curious paperback novella apparently written by one M. Anthony Penwill.

My book is an edited version of my website which partly summarises events, though leaves things open enough that the viewer must do some ‘looking’ themselves, question the subtext, and take on the role of the detective, piecing together clues from (seemingly disparate) objects and images after reading the full story. It encourages participation in the display, and gives viewers something to take away and digest, when they can involve themselves in the narrative further by visiting the blog for further instalments, or even start their own – as Skultans suggests (1998: xii) “many people with eventful lives have little to say about them” and whilst mine may not be the most dramatic, documenting it (and my alter ego) has certainly made the past couple of years very exciting – the artist will be missed.

Meanwhile, the ringing telephone and miniature fortune telling booth are other interactive elements to engage the audience, and the involvement of my colleague, friend and lookalike Paul at the private view is a scaled down version of the performance I had planned before the University’s policies meant we had to rein in our ambitions.

His appearance is a reference to the recurrent themes of the alter ego, synchronicity and mistaken identity, and a ‘playful yet sincere’ attempt to confuse the viewer, making them question what is real and what is not, thus referencing several works of art and popular culture, the most relevant example being Dostoevsky’s The Double, in which, according to Chizhevsky (in Wellek, 1962: 129) “the double puts with extreme power the question: will the individual discover a new stability and a new life in absolute being, or will he perish in nothingness?”

This resonates completely with my situation, in which those separate lives of the artist and the teacher should hopefully merge from now on, because the whole theory of the doppelganger is that when someone is confronted with his ‘double’ it is a sign that his life will end, thus, the two cannot continue to co-exist.

Bibliography

LITERATURE

Barthes, R. (1977 Ed.) The Death of the Author (from Image, Music, Text), New York: Hill & Wang.
Bourriaud, N. (1998) Relational Aesthetics, Dijon: Les Presses du Reel.
Godfrey, M. (ed.) (2010) Francis Alys – A Story of Deception, London: Tate Publishing.
Hirst, D. & Burn, G. (2001) On The Way to Work, London: Faber & Faber.
Marzona, D. (2006) Conceptual Art, Cologne: Taschen.
Middleton, T (1999) An Introduction to The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, London: Wordsworth.
Penwill, M. A. (2009) It Has To Be This Way, London: Matt’s Gallery.
Phelan, P. (1993) Unmarked – The Politics of Performance, London: Routledge.
Skultans, V. (1998) The Testimony of Lives: Narrative and Memory in Post-Soviet Latvia, London: Routledge.
Wallinger, M. (2000) Credo at Tate Liverpool, London: Tate Publishing.
Wellek, R. (1962) Dostoevsky – A Collection of Critical Essays, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Wilson, S. & Lack, J. (2008) The Tate Guide to Modern Art Terms, London: Tate Publishing.

JOURNALS

Platt, Edward (2010) ‘Telling Stories with a Life of Their Own’, Tate Etc, Issue 19 Summer 2010, pp48-55.
Cumming, Laura (2010) ‘Art’, New Review Section, The Observer, 20 June, p37.

Post Script

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Wanting a fitting climax to this chapter, he felt he had little alternative but to revisit the place where the chapter itself began.

A year and a week after the first trip, it was back to the seaside town that they forgot to shut down, where every day is like sunday. Morecambe always held a special place in his heart, for no real reason other than nostalgia and his childhood – but since August 2009, it also meant this.

Twelve months on, predicitions recorded, similarities noted, and resonances documented, it was time to see what the next twelve months on had in store. It had, for him, been a year of change – much had happened, most of which had been predicted, but was this a self-fulfilling prophecy? Or, as several observers had suggested, just a coincidence? Or, most intriguingly, was this a case of another fortune cookie (opened last September) being proved right?

Whatever the reasoning behind it, in a way he wanted closure, and as before, wanted to anticipate future events. Sceptics or psychics can probably predict the outcome, but this is what happened next.

Morecambe, 1st August 2010, 3.30pm

On the way they saw this guy.


He had decided to get dressed up for the occasion. He didn’t want her to remember him, and this was a different project now. Someone once suggested going for a fortune telling in disguise – this was as good as, his ‘new eyes’ being hidden by glasses, once again he was taking on a different persona.

The waiting room was different. He noticed new pictures: perhaps they’d had a re-decoration. Certainly, he hadn’t seen the photo before, the one with about fifty members of a family on, presumably at some funeral, judging by the solemn faces and the bouquets of sad-looking flowers. He looked closer, and recognised at least three of the women. They had all read his palm last summer – he knew most of them were related, but always presumed the first reading had been unique.

Maybe that explained the initial links.

He also noticed a new sign above the exit – one that read

EUROPEAN LAW STATES THAT PALM READINGS MUST BE SEEN AS A FORM OF ENTERTAINMENT

The curtain opened and there she was, showing out a girl – Lisa – who had been having her tarots read. She explained the family photo to the girl, who reckoned they were related in some way, as her grandfather’s cousin shared a name with the dead mother-in-law being mourned.

In he went.

He made the wish on the crystal ball – last year’s had come true, after all – and then they got down to business.

“These are very creative hands, very creative. You must put them to good use, and take care of them.”

Oh no, he thought, she must have read Jonathan’s blog, followed the project. After all, she had confused things with Lisa’s reading too – this one was good!

Disappointingly, or interestingly, however, pretty much the same script followed.

“You’ve been pig-headed and stubborn, you’ve made mistakes, but you don’t need to worry so much over the next year. You’ve got a long life line, you won’t be a burden, you’ve got good health, the odd trip to the doctor’s for medicines but that’s all. And your love line’s strong – you’re surrounded by very caring people who think a lot of you.”

The next part unsettled him a little.

“You bear the marriage line, and the widow’s line – which means you’ll be on your own, might be for a day, a week, or longer. I see an even number of children, and I see feathering, were you ill early on in your life?” He had been as a youngster.

Then, back to normal. he went on to mention the bottle or glass again. He knew who she means. The two-faced person too, he can identify this individual too now, nothing to worry about she said, “just a nuisance, that’s all, won’t cause harm to you or your family”.

“I see sugar in your palm… a birth, death and a marriage over the next eighteen months, the death will be someone over 75, not a surprise, you’ll have a good time at the wedding (he already had done the day before) I see travel but happy travel, holidays and that. I see changes at work, things will be more settled this year, and at home, are you looking to move?”

Did he have any questions, she asked. He was too busy trying to weigh up the accuracy of these prophecies, asking himself if this was to be a new chapter after all, or just a reprint. History couldn’t be about to repeat itself, surely?

He bought three lucky charms. A boxing glove, a fish, and an elf. These were very lucky, she said, he must look after them.

She took the money and bade him farewell, asked him to return and said he “should have the cards next time.”

That should be the end of the story, but unbeknownst to him, whilst he was inside, his accomplice had had an interesting encounter of her own. Looking at the ephemera in the window she was approached by an old woman in the beer garden next door.

Don’t waste your money!” she shouted. “She doesn’t know what she’s talking about. I went to see her, she said I won’t be a burden.”

“Won’t be a burden, pah! I’ve got terminal cancer.”

Then, he got home, lucky charms still in his pocket, and his goldfish had died.

And so it begins again.

July

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

The twelfth month ended as the first began, with a strange looking bird telling me my fortune.

For most of July, I was slowly adjusting to life with good vision. Halfway through the month I discovered a friend I’d not spoken to for a while had had the exact same procedure a couple of months before I had, which for her had unfortunately not been such a positive experience. At times, the ‘new me’ misses the ‘old me’s’ glasses, even though I have bought a couple of pairs of ‘falsies’ for future appearances as ‘the other’.

Still, being able to see more clearly doesn’t mean other people can, and at different times this month I have been called Greenback and Greenwood by people who should probably know better: meanwhile, a strange old drunkard on the train said I looked like Pete Best’s grandson, whilst I was finally re-united with Ema Hesire at Liverpool Cathedral. British Gas got me and my bill mixed up with somebody else too, with hilarious consequences (if you happen to ever hear the subsequent conversation) but thankfully the phone calls seem to have dried up, those Jamaican scammers presumably tiring of their efforts to take on my identity. One strange night time occurrence that did happen though, was my dream that our goldfish killed herself and four days later, I found little B floating lifeless.

Meanwhile, my inspiration was rediscovered following a trip to ‘that’ London for an old friend’s thirtieth birthday party. Our hotel reservation at the Old Friend Hotel was not honoured, however we moved to the CV hotel three doors away – a sign for changes at work, I wonder? Anyway the party was great, as was the following day’s excursion to see the Francis Alys exhibition at Tate Modern.

Entitled A Story of Deception, and described by one critic as the ‘greatest ever show of a living artists work’ there, I was looking forward very much to discovering more about this fellow whom I had been recommended to research recently. I left overwhelmed by the Belgian born artist’s prolific career and some of his ‘actions’ which resonated with some of the things I have tried to do, only not half as well. These beautiful drawings, films and objects which document ongoing projects he continues to undertake, including The Rumour, Deja Vu and Doppelganger, deserve a higher profile in my opinion – particularly the latter, which the artist started in Istanbul in 1999 and explains thus:

When arriving in (new city), wander, looking for someone who could be you. If the meeting happens, walk beside your doppelganger until your pace adjusts to his/hers.

When discussing this with the very knowledgeable Imogen Stidworthy (who herself investigates narratives and impersonators) a few days later, she suggested I read Dostoevsky’s The Double, and straight away I realised my ignorance – this being a perfect metaphor and lead-up to what I’ve been going on about for months. It focuses on the old and young Golyadkins, and in this short story “the ordinariness of everyday life is strangely shot through with the fantastic, naturalistic portrayal alternates with the pathos of an abstract idea, the sober striving for reality with ecstatic visions of the world beyond the confines of reality” (Chizhevsky, cited in Rene Wellek’s 1962 Dostoevsky) and will be useful over the next few weeks as the end approaches.

As will the wise words of John, the brightly coloured sooth saying budgie of the South Bank, who sagely advised me of future events with the help of his glamorous assistant Jenny.

This prediction, whilst mostly accurate and highly entertaining, didn’t quite offer the climax to the story I wanted, so I had little alternative other than to return to

a woman about a hand, to see if she could help once again…